Enhancing Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) controls within the VCC sector - Waystone

      Enhancing Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) controls within the VCC sector

      The VCC regime was launched in Singapore in January 2020, and in 2021, MAS conducted an industry-wide survey of VCCs, looking at how selected Eligible Financial Institutions (“EFIs”) have implemented AML/CFT controls for their respective VCCs.

      Some key observations for VCCs and their EFIs are set out below:

      • in some instances, there was insufficient oversight by VCCs of appointed EFIs
      • some VCCs failed to put in place arrangements to oversee the ongoing implementation of AML/CFT controls by their VCCs
      • in some instances, there was no agreed escalation process between its mandated EFI and the VCC to ensure pertinent issues were escalated to the VCC in a timely manner
      • where there was an escalation process, some VCCs failed to specify sufficient details within policies and procedures
      • some VCCs did not indicate that they had appointed an EFI even though it was a Notice requirement.

      In addition, MAS discovered instances where there were gaps in controls, such as:

      • a lack of a robust framework for assessing customers’ ML/TF risks
      • a failure to consider relevant risk factors in assessing country or geographic risks
      • customer risk assessments were not sufficiently documented.

      Supervisory expectations for VCCs and their EFIs

      VCCs should note that they remain ultimately responsible for fulfilling their AML/CFT obligations, and they should ensure that they exercise adequate oversight over their relationship with their EFIs.

      VCCs should also ensure that the AML/CFT policies and procedures (P&Ps) implemented by their EFIs to mitigate money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF) risks are appropriate.

      In addition to the responsibility of having defined reporting and oversight obligations and stringent policies and procedures in place, VCCs also need to conduct robust risk assessments to correctly identify, understand and assess the ML/TF risks of their customers, so that they can apply the appropriate customer due diligence and ongoing monitoring measures.

      Ongoing monitoring is key to detecting customers that present higher ML/TF risks post-onboarding.

      These key observations noted in the Circular should help VCCs to better understand their AML/CFT obligations.

      How can Waystone help?

      To find out how Waystone can help, reach out to your usual Waystone representative or contact us below.

      Previous post Next post

      More like this

      Regulatory Compliance Updates October 2022 – APAC Region

      To learn more about these changes, contact our APAC Compliance Solutions team today. 31 October 2022 - ID 14/22 Mitigating…
      Read more

      Regulatory Compliance Updates September 2022 – APAC Region

      If you have any questions about the below updates, please reach out to our APAC compliance team for more information.…
      Read more

      Regulatory Compliance Updates August 2022 – APAC Region

      31 August 2022 - MAS imposes composition penalty of $375,000 on UOB Kay Hian Private Limited for business conduct and…
      Read more

      Audit Preparation For Business Continuity Management

      Revised Business Continuity Management (“BCM”) Guidelines were introduced in June 2022, setting out the principles that Financial Institutions (“FIs”) are…
      Read more

      Key Takeaways From MAS Information Paper on AML/CFT For External Asset Managers

      The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has issued an information paper setting out MAS’ supervisory expectations of effective anti-money laundering…
      Read more

      Regulatory Compliance Updates July 2022 – APAC Region

      28 July 2022 - CFC 02/2022 Disclosure and Reporting Guidelines for Retail ESG Funds This Circular sets out MAS’ expectations…
      Read more