Establishing the sources of wealth of customers – MAS issues new circular

      On 26 July, MAS issued a new circular on establishing the sources of wealth (“SOW”) of customers.

      We have set out below the key points addressed in this communication. In addition, you can read the full circular update here.

      Who does this update apply to?

      The scope of the new updates is applicable to Financial Institutions (“FIs”) in the wealth management sector. Please note that the term “customers” refers to both the clients of wealth management businesses and their beneficial owners.

      Risk-proportionate approaches for Financial Institutions

      In establishing the SOW of customers, FIs should not apply a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach for all its customers. Instead, FIs should ensure that its policies and procedures are risk proportionate and reasonable, taking into account the unique circumstances and profile of each customer.

      MAS has set out the following risk principles that FIs should consider:

      Materiality

      • FIs should seek to obtain information on the customer’s entire wealth to the extent practicable
      • the primary goal is to determine the SOW that are more material or higher risk
      • MAS recognizes that it may not be possible or practical to corroborate some SOW, particularly those from many years ago where documentation may no longer be available
      • in lieu of this, FIs should:
        • focus on corroborating the SOW that are more material or higher risk
        • asses whether the residual risk of the uncorroborated wealth is acceptable to the FI
        • implement additional risk-mitigating measures if the uncorroborated wealth poses an unacceptable risk.

      Prudence

      • FIs should use reliable third-party corroboration material to establish SOW, such as audited accounts and documents issued by independent third parties, for example, tax accountants
      • any benchmarks or assumptions used must be reasonable, relevant, and appropriate for the customer
      • the rationale for benchmarks/assumptions should be documented and reviewed
      • benchmarks/assumptions should not be used to support suspicious SOW explanations.

      Relevance

      • FIs should focus on obtaining the most relevant corroborative documents, exercising reasonable judgment
      • where possible, FIs may leverage on independent and reliable public sources to corroborate SOW, rather than solely relying on customer-provided evidence.

      Importance of SOW establishment in AML/CFT controls

      FIs should note that SOW establishment is part of a broader framework of AML/CFT controls. As such, senior management should:

      1. exercise close oversight over higher risk accounts – for example being unable to corroborate significant portion of customer’s wealth
      2. ensure that ongoing monitoring controls take into account the customer risk profile.

      How can Waystone Compliance Solutions help?

      Our dedicated team of APAC compliance professionals has extensive experience in navigating the complexities of regulatory compliance in Singapore. If you require more information on this topic or would like to find out how this could impact your business, please reach out to your usual Waystone Compliance Solutions representative or contact us below.

      Contact us

      Previous post Next post
      Share

      More like this

      Payment Service Provider Licence Application – MAS issues amendments to its Guidelines

      The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has published amendments to its Guidelines on Licensing for Payment Service Providers [PS –…
      Read more

      Regulatory Compliance Updates July 2024 – APAC Region

      This APAC regulatory update includes – The Guidelines on Risk Management Practices – Internal Controls – Section 3.13 on “Securitisation”;…
      Read more

      Updates to Singapore's Money Laundering National Risk Assessment and Terrorism Financing National Risk Assessment

      As part of Singapore’s continuing efforts to maintain the effectiveness of its anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism…
      Read more

      Regulatory Compliance Updates June 2024 – APAC Region

      This APAC regulatory update includes – the Publication of Final Amendments to Over-The-Counter (“OTC”) Derivatives Reporting Regulations and Revised Guidelines…
      Read more

      Guidelines on fair dealing – board and senior management responsibilities for delivering fair dealing outcomes to customers (FSG-G04)

      Following the update on the revised guidelines, all financial institutions (FIs) will be expected to incorporate key principles of fair…
      Read more

      Singapore regulatory outlook and trends

      Business Continuity Management Guidelines The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) revised Business Continuity Management Guidelines are applicable to all financial…
      Read more