US State Data Privacy Laws – a comparison

      As more US states introduce privacy laws, companies must be aware of and be able to manage the varying provisions of each, which can make cross-state privacy compliance a very complex undertaking. Waystone Compliance Solutions can guide you through these nuances and help you to navigate the privacy laws that apply to your business.

      We have put together a guide below to help you to learn more about the differences between the CCPA, CPRA, CDPA, CTDPA, CPA and UCPA, where they take territorial effect, the application threshold, and whether privacy impact assessments fall in scope or not.

      US State Data Privacy Laws comparison chart

      Law Effective Enforcment Agency
      California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018

      CCPA

      January 1, 2020 California Attorney General
      California Privacy Rights Act of 2020

      CPRA

      January 1, 2023 California Privacy Protection Agency
      Colorado Privacy Act

      CPA

      July 1, 2023 Colorado Attorney General or District Attorney
      Connecticut Data Protection Act

      CTDPA

      July 1, 2023 Connecticut Attorney General
      Utah Consumer Privacy Act

      UCPA

      December 31, 2023 Utah Attorney General
      Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act

      CDPA

      January 1, 2023 Virginia Attorney General
      Territorial Scope Application Threshold
      CCPA For-profit business that collect personal information from Californian residents Gross annual revenue of over USD 25 million or buying, receiving, or selling the personal information of 50,000 or more Californian residents, households, or devices or deriving 50% or more of their annual revenue from selling California residents’ personal information.
      CPRA For-profit business that collect personal information from Californian residents Gross annual revenue of over USD 25 million or buying, receiving, or selling or sharing the personal information of 100,000 or more California residents or households or deriving 50% or more of their annual revenue from selling or sharing California residents’ personal information.
      CPA Any data controller that conducts businesses in Colorado or data controllers that produce or deliver commercial products or services intentionally targeted to residents of Colorado. Controlling or processing the personal data of at least 100,000 consumers in a calendar year or processing or controlling the personal data of 25,000 consumers or more and deriving revenue or receive discount on the price of goods or services from the sale of personal data.
      CTDPA Persons that conduct business in Connecticut or persons that produce products or services that are targeted to residents of Connecticut. Controlling or processing the personal data of not less than 100,000 consumers (excluding processing for the purposes of completing a payment transaction) or controlling or processing the personal data of not less than 25,000 Connecticut residents and deriving more than 25% of gross revenue from the sale of personal data.
      UCPA Any controller or processor who conducts business in Utah or produces a product or service that is targeted to consumers who are residents of Utah. Annual revenue of USD 25,000,000 or more and during a calendar year, controls or processes personal data of 100,000 or more consumers or derives over 50% of the entity’s gross revenue from the sale of personal data and controls or processes personal data of 25,000 or more consumers.
      CDPA Persons that do business in the Commonwealth of Virginia or persons who produce products or services that are targeted to residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Processing or controlling personal data of at least 100,000 consumers in a calendar year or processing or controlling the personal data of at least 25,000 consumers and deriving over 50% of gross revenue from selling that data.
      Does a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) need to be conducted? What should be included in a Privacy Impact Assessment?
      CCPA N/A N/A
      CPRA Businesses whose processing presents a significant risk to consumer privacy or security must submit regular assessments to the CPPA. Businesses conducting a PIA under the CPRA should identify and weigh the benefits resulting form the processing to the business, the consumer, other stakeholders, and the public, against the potential risks to the rights of the consumer associated with such processing.
      CPA Data controllers are required to carry out a PIA, for activities including:

      • The processing for the purposes of targeted advertising
      • Profiling, if said profiling presents a heightened risk of harm
      • The sale of personal data.
      A PIA should weigh the risks and benefits of the processing activity and should include several factors such as:

      • The context of the processing
      • The reasonable expectations of consumers
      • The relationship between the controller and the consumer whose personal data will be processed
      • The use of de-identified data.
      CTDPA Controllers shall conduct a data protection assessment for activities that present a heightened risk of harm to a consumer, including, but not limited to, the processing of personal data for the purposes of targeted advertising, profiling, and the sale of personal data. Data protection assessments should identify and weigh the benefits against the potential risks to the rights of the consumer.

      The controller should factor the following into a data protection assessment:

      • The use of de-identified data
      • The context of the processing
      • The relationship between the controller and the consumer.
      • The reasonable expectations of consumers
      UCPA N/A N/A
      CDPA Data controllers are required to carry out a PIA, for activities including:

      • The processing of personal data for targeted advertising
      • The sale of personal data
      • The processing of sensitive data
      • Processing activities involving personal data that present a heightened risk of harm to consumers.
      A PIA must also consider the balance between the risks and benefits of the processing activity and should also include:

      • The context of processing
      • The reasonable expectations of consumers
      • The use of de-identified data
      • The relationship between the controllers and the consumer whose personal data will be processed.

      If you have any questions about US Privacy Laws as they come into effect, please reach out to our Cyber and Data Protection team today.

      Contact us

      Previous post Next post
      Share

      More like this

      LinkedIn Account Takeovers and Ransom Demands - A Threat Extending to Business Accounts

      In the ever-evolving landscape of cyber security, new threats are constantly emerging, targeting our personal and professional digital spaces.
      Read more

      SEC Adopts Rules on Cyber Security Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure by Public Companies

      The SEC has voted today to adopt new rules requiring public companies to disclose material cyber security incidents and, to…
      Read more

      Business Email Compromise – is your business protected?

      In today's digital age, email has become an essential tool for business communication. However, with the increasing reliance on email,…
      Read more

      The California Privacy Rights Act – what it means for consumers and businesses

      The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) is a privacy law that was passed in California in November 2020 and came…
      Read more

      Open comment period for SEC’s proposed cyber security requirements deadline

      The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seeking public comment on proposed cyber security requirements for investment advisers and broker-dealers.…
      Read more

      SEC Commissioner Lizárraga’s speech at the Digital Directors Network 2023 conference

      Recently, Commissioner Lizárraga spoke at the Digital Directors Network 2023 conference. We can gain valuable insights from the speeches that…
      Read more